Which Is the Best Multiclass SVM Method? An Empirical Study
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Empirical evidence is given to show that the one-versus-all method using winner-takes-all strategy and the one to one method implemented by max-wins voting are inferior to another one-Versus-one method: one that uses Platt's posterior probabilities together with the pairwise coupling idea of Hastie and Tibshirani.
Abstract
Multiclass SVMs are usually implemented by combining several two-class SVMs. The one-versus-all method using winner-takes-all strategy and the one-versus-one method implemented by max-wins voting are popularly used for this purpose. In this paper we give empirical evidence to show that these methods are inferior to another one-versus-one method: one that uses Platt's posterior probabilities together with the pairwise coupling idea of Hastie and Tibshirani. The evidence is particularly strong when the training dataset is sparse.
