login

Observation and Experiment on the Cusp of Collaboration: A Parallel Examination of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology

The Journal of Clinical PharmacologyPublished 1 September 2000
David F. Lehmann
Citations8
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.76
SNIP0.90

TL;DR

The two disciplines are juxtaposes to emphasize common areas of interest despite differences in methodology and weaknesses and strengths are contrasted in an effort to document the mirror image nature of both clinical pharmacology and pharmacoepidemiology.

Abstract

Despite a common interest in the effect of drugs in humans, clinical pharmacologists and pharmacoepidemiologists often operate in isolation since the knowledge base underlying the respective parent disciplines of pharmacology and epidemiology is quite distinct. This lack of communication may lead to a potential for lost opportunities that would otherwise be mutually beneficial. Accordingly, this article juxtaposes the two disciplines to emphasize common areas of interest despite differences in methodology. In addition, weaknesses and strengths are contrasted in an effort to document the mirror image nature of both clinical pharmacology and pharmacoepidemiology in this regard. Specific examples underlying the complementary nature of the two disciplines are also offered that may help to stimulate collaboration. The possibility of greater formal cooperation between societies representing the two disciplines is also suggested to cross-educate both clinical pharmacologists and pharmacoepidemiologists as a means to foster collaboration.

Keywords

MathematicsDecision SciencesPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics