login

GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength

Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyPublished 7 April 2013Open access
Jeffrey C Andrews, Holger J. Schünemann, Andrew D Oxman, Kevin Pottie, Joerg J Meerpohl, Pablo Alonso Coello
Citations1,295
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score3.15
SNIP2.66
View PDF

TL;DR

This article addresses GRADE's approach to determining the direction and strength of a recommendation, which describes the balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes of interest among alternative management strategies depending on four domains, namely estimates of effect for desirable and desirable outcomes ofinterest, confidence in the estimates ofEffect, estimates of values and preferences, and resource use.

Abstract

In the GRADE approach, the strength of a recommendation reflects the extent to which we can be confident that the composite desirable effects of a management strategy outweigh the composite undesirable effects. This article addresses GRADE's approach to determining the direction and strength of a recommendation. The GRADE describes the balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes of interest among alternative management strategies depending on four domains, namely estimates of effect for desirable and undesirable outcomes of interest, confidence in the estimates of effect, estimates of values and preferences, and resource use. Ultimately, guideline panels must use judgment in integrating these factors to make a strong or weak recommendation for or against an intervention.

Keywords

Decision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and FinanceHealth Professions