An investigation of consumer reactions to the use of different brand names
Journal of Product & Brand ManagementPublished 1 February 1998
Subodh Bhat, Gail E. Kelley, Kathleen O’Donnell
Citations26
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.89
SNIP1.67
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
We examined consumer reactions to new products introduced under four different brand naming scenarios. The results suggest that when consumers see a high degree of fit between the new product and the existing brand, brand extensions, sub‐brands, and nested brands are about equally preferred. But when consumers perceive little fit, a new brand name is the most preferred, followed by nested brands, sub‐brands, and extensions, in that order.
Keywords
PsychologySocial SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Journal of MarketingConsumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions
2,475 Citations1990David A. Aaker, Kevin Lane Keller
Journal of MarketingConsumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions
1,574 Citations1990David A. Aaker, Kevin Lane Keller
Journal of Consumer ResearchEvaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency
1,291 Citations1991Chae-rin Park, Sandra Milberg +1 more
When a brand's concept is consistent with those of its extension products, the prestige brand seems to have greater extendibility to products with low feature similarity than the functional brand does.
Journal of Marketing ResearchThe Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions
1,172 Citations1992Kevin Lane Keller, David A. Aaker
The findings indicate that evaluations of a proposed extension when there were intervening extensions differed from evaluations whenthere were no intervening extensions only when there was a significant disparity between the perceived quality of the intervening extension (as judged by its success or failure) and the perceivedquality of the core brand.
Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind
1,073 Citations1981Al Ries, Jack Trout
