The Logic of Tests of Significance
Philosophy of SciencePublished 1 March 1976
Roger Carlson
Citations10
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.69
SNIP0.82
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationLogic of Statistical Inference.
616 Citations1966A. P. Dempster, Ian Hacking
BiometrikaStudies in the history of probability and statistics. XIV Some incidents in the early history of biometry and statistics, 1890-94
59 Citations1965E. S. Pearson
Perhaps the two great formative periods in the history of mathematical statistics were the years 1890-1905 and 1915-30; in both, the remarkable leap forward was made in answer to a need for new theory and techniques to help in solving very real problems in the biological field.
Philosophy of ScienceThe Logic of Tests of Significance
57 Citations1974Stephen Spielman
The goal of the paper is to describe precisely the pattern of inductive reasoning that is characteristic of Fisherian tests of significance, and to show that while it is far more cogent than Fisher's critics have realized, it does not logically sustain the inferences it sanctions.
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationNote on Dr. Berkson's Criticism of Tests of Significance
12 Citations1943Rosemary A. Fisher