Calibrating Benefit Function Transfer to Assess the Conservation Reserve Program
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsPublished 1 February 1997Open access
Peter Feather, Daniel Hellerstein
Citations69
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.43
SNIP2.03
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract Benefit transfer offers an inexpensive alternative to conducting an original study to determine economic value. Unfortunately, benefit transfers can also result in biased welfare estimates. In this paper, we suggest a method of calibrating the benefit transfer to reduce this bias. An empirical example to determine the benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program on water‐based recreation illustrates the potentially large biases that can result if the transfer is not calibrated.
Keywords
Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
Journal of the Operational Research SocietyDiscrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand.
5,616 Citations1987Mark Uncles, Moshe Ben‐Akiva +1 more
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsA Repeated Nested‐Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing
323 Citations1993Edward R. Morey, Robert D. Rowe +1 more
Water Resources ResearchThe evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: Benefit function transfer
300 Citations1992John B. Loomis
Water Resources ResearchEstimating the value of water quality improvements in a recreational demand framework
286 Citations1987Nancy E. Bockstael, W. Michael Hanemann +1 more
Three general types of models are described: systems of demands, discrete choice models, and the hedonic travel cost approach; the latter two models are demonstrated using a common data set on water quality and swimming behavior in the Boston area.
Water Resources ResearchBenefit transfer: Conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies
272 Citations1992William H. Desvousges, Michael C. Naughton +1 more
Water Resources ResearchBenefit transfer studies: Myths, pragmatism, and idealism
268 Citations1992Kevin Boyle, John C. Bergstrom
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsWorking Wives and Food away from Home: The Box‐Cox Double Hurdle Model
195 Citations1993Steven T. Yen
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)Water Quality Benefits from the Conservation Reserve Program
140 Citations1989Marc Ribaudo, Ribaudo, Marc O.
Land EconomicsSite Aggregation in a Random Utility Model of Recreation
103 Citations1992George R. Parsons, Michael S. Needelman
Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementA Demand Theory for Number of Trips in a Random Utility Model of Recreation
63 Citations1995George R. Parsons, Mary Jo Kealy
Water Resources ResearchBenefits and costs of pulp and paper effluent controls under the Clean Water Act
52 Citations1992Ralph A. Luken, F. Reed Johnson +1 more
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsDistinguishing between Market Participation and Infrequency of Purchase Models of Butter Demand
46 Citations1993Noel Blisard, James R. Blaylock
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsWelfare Estimation Using Aggregate and Individual‐Observation Models: A Comparison Using Monte Carlo Techniques
41 Citations1995Daniel Hellerstein
