login

The impact of a comprehensive evaluation in the management of cancer pain

PainPublished 1 November 1991
Gilbert R. Gonzales, Kathryn Elliott, Russell K. Portenoy, Kathleen M. Foley
Citations93
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.02
SNIP1.87

TL;DR

The data confirm the importance of a comprehensive neuro‐oncologic evaluation in the management of cancer pain and suggest an understanding of oncology, neurology and medicine is critical to assess and treat these patients.

Abstract

To evaluate the importance of a comprehensive evaluation in the management of patients with cancer pain, we surveyed 276 consecutive consultations (226 retrospectively and 50 prospectively) performed by the pain consultant at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. For all consultations, the pain diagnosis, other medical and neurologic diagnoses, investigations and suggested therapeutic interventions were recorded. The pain consultation identified a previously undiagnosed etiology for the pain in 64% of patients in both surveys. Metastatic neoplasm was the most common lesion discovered. In addition, the prospective survey yielded new neurologic diagnoses in 36% of patients and an unsuspected infection in 4%. Eighteen percent of prospectively surveyed patients received radiotherapy, surgery or chemotherapy based on the findings of the pain consultant. These data confirm the importance of a comprehensive neuro-oncologic evaluation in the management of cancer pain. An understanding of oncology, neurology and medicine is critical to assess and treat these patients.

Keywords

Medicine