Quality Improvement Practices in Korea, New Zealand and the USA

Abstract

Considers the approaches to quality improvement undertaken by organizations in Korea, New Zealand and the United States of America. Relates alternative quality improvement approaches to actual operating and financial performance. Productivity improvement approaches were also investigated and related to performance. Multiple quality and productivity interventions were correlated with eight actual quality, three productivity, and three financial performance measures. Results indicate that a specific profile of quality and productivity improvement approaches was significantly related to performance. The results varied in the different countries, but no country achieved significant correlations with all measures. The profiles varied, depending on whether organizations in the various countries were most interested in performance quality, productivity improvement, or financial performance.