<i>p</i> < .05 — But Is It <i>Clinically</i> Significant? Practical Examples for Clinicians
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Many researchers report the p value of an analysis to communicate whether findings are significant, but a better understanding is gained by then calculating the effect size (d), which enables effects and strengths of association to be compared among studies.
Abstract
Many researchers report the p value of an analysis to communicate whether findings are significant. This may be misinterpreted to imply that if p < .05 the finding is also of clinical significance. Researchers should also report the magnitude of the association, an easily calculated statistic, to allow a better understanding of results when p < .05. Methods for doing this for t , χ 2 , and F values are given. The clinical significance of an intervention is also commonly determined by whether p < .05. A better understanding, however, is gained by then calculating the effect size ( d ). This measure enables effects and strengths of association to be compared among studies. Methods for doing this, for the same statistics, are given.
