Pay Secrecy versus Pay Disclosure for Salesmen: A Longitudinal Study
Journal of Marketing ResearchPublished 1 May 1978
Charles M. Futrell, Omer C. Jenkins
Citations60
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score6.96
SNIP2.42
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
On the basis of a “before-after with control group” experimental design, empirical evidence is provided that shows the amount of information disclosed about pay had a major impact on salesmen's performance and job satisfaction.
Keywords
PsychologySocial Sciences
California Management ReviewThe Mythology of Management Compensation
51 Citations1966Edward E. Lawler
Journal of Marketing ResearchJob Performance Related to Management Control Systems for Pharmaceutical Salesmen
51 Citations1976Charles M. Futrell, John E. Swan +1 more
Three national firms’ salesmen’s perceptions of their control system were related to the salesmen's performance to identify the most important control system characteristics.
Academy of Management JournalPay Secrecy: Who Is For And Against It?
31 Citations1973J. R. Schuster, Jerome A. Colletti
Business HorizonsSecrecy or disclosure in management compensation?
12 Citations1975Paul Thompson, John Pronsky
