login

Cognitive representations and processes in arithmetic: Inferences from the performance of brain-damaged subjects.

Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionPublished 1 January 1991
Scott M. Sokol, Michael McCloskey, Neal J. Cohen, Donna Aliminosa
Citations204
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.23
SNIP1.24

TL;DR

Data is presented from two brain-damaged patients with calculation impairments in support of claims about the cognitive mechanisms underlying simple arithmetic performance to make the following theoretical claims: that some arithmetic facts are stored in the form of individual fact representations, and that calculation algorithms may include special-case procedures that function to increase the speed or efficiency of problem solving.

Abstract

In this article, we present data from two brain-damaged patients with calculation impairments in support of claims about the cognitive mechanisms underlying simple arithmetic performance. We first present a model of the functional architecture of the cognitive calculation system based on previous research. We then elaborate this architecture through detailed examination of the patterns of spared and impaired performance of the two patients. From the patients' performance we make the following theoretical claims: that some arithmetic facts are stored in the form of individual fact representations (e.g., 9 x 4 = 36), whereas other facts are stored in the form of a general rule (e.g., 0 x N = 0); that arithmetic fact retrieval is mediated by abstract internal representations that are independent of the form in which problems are presented or responses are given; that arithmetic facts and calculation procedures are functionally independent; and that calculation algorithms may include special-case procedures that function to increase the speed or efficiency of problem solving. We conclude with a discussion of several more general issues relevant to the reported research.

Keywords

PsychologyMathematicsNeuroscience