Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation
Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementPublished 1 January 1997
Wiktor Adamowicz, Joffre Swait́, Peter C. Boxall, Jordan J. Louviere, Michael Williams
Citations507
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score3.17
SNIP2.21
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This study examines perceptions and objective attribute measures in discrete choice models of recreation site choice behavior. These forms of attribute measurement are examined in individual and combined revealed preference/stated preference models. Our results suggest that the model based on perceptions slightly outperforms the models based on objective attribute measures. However, issues such as the definition of the choice set and the measurement of welfare present significant challenges when using perceptions data.
Keywords
PsychologyEconomics, Econometrics and FinanceEnvironmental Science
Journal of the Operational Research SocietyDiscrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand.
5,616 Citations1987Mark Uncles, Moshe Ben‐Akiva +1 more
Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementCombining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities
1,479 Citations1994Wiktor Adamowicz, Jordan J. Louviere +1 more
Journal of Marketing ResearchDesign and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data
1,404 Citations1983Jordan J. Louviere, George Woodworth
Journal of Marketing ResearchThe Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models
1,142 Citations1993Joffre Swait́, Jordan J. Louviere
Transportation Research Part A GeneralEstimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions
386 Citations1990Moshe Ben‐Akiva, Takayuki Morikawa
A methodology for modeling switching behavior using simultaneously cross-sectional revealed preference (RP) data and stated intentions, a type of stated preference (SP) data, and combined estimation with RP and SP data is proposed.
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsA Repeated Nested‐Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing
323 Citations1993Edward R. Morey, Robert D. Rowe +1 more
Land EconomicsCombining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for the Valuation of Nonmarket Goods
295 Citations1992Trudy Ann Cameron
Marketing LettersExperimental analysis of choice
269 Citations1994Richard T. Carson, Jordan J. Louviere +10 more
Journal of the Operational Research SocietyDiscrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand
192 Citations1987Mark Uncles
TransportationA sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice
135 Citations1994Joffre Swait́, Jordan J. Louviere +1 more
It is shown that the proposed sequential approach to using SP and RP data has the same or better predictive power as the model calibrated solely on the RP data, when measured in terms of Pearson's Chi-squared ratio and the percent correctly predicted statistic.
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsUsing Random Utility Models to Estimate the Recreational Value of Estuarine Resources
122 Citations1995Yoshiaki Kaoru, V. Kerry Smith +1 more
Transportation ScienceStatistical Comparison of Non-Nested Probabilistic Discrete Choice Models
104 Citations1983Joël L. Horowitz
Water Resources ResearchInfluence of Choice Set Considerations in Modeling the Benefits From Improved Water Quality
75 Citations1995T. J. Peters, Wiktor Adamowicz +1 more
The standard approach to random utility models is compared with an alternative that uses an estimate of each sampled individual's specific choice set, which produces model parameters and welfare estimates that are quite different from those using standard assumptions.
