Internal<i>Versus</i>External Control of Reinforcement and Awareness in a Conditioning Task
The Journal of PsychologyPublished 1 September 1969
Luahna K. Ude, Roger E. Vogler
Citations20
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.93
SNIP1.01
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
(1969). Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement and Awareness in a Conditioning Task. The Journal of Psychology: Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 63-67.
Keywords
Psychology
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyInternal versus external control of reinforcement and decision time.
336 Citations1965Julian B. Rotter, Ray C. Mulry
The hypothesis was investigated that "internals" and "externals" differ in the value placed on the same reward depending upon whether it is perceived as contingent upon chance or skill, and it was hypothesized that internals take longer with skill instructions, externals with chance instructions.
Psychological ReviewSome implications of a social learning theory for the prediction of goal directed behavior from testing procedures.
187 Citations1960Julian B. Rotter
Many sophisticated observers are aware that a wide gap exists between personality theory and the techniques or procedures used to measure personality variables, and this gap may well be a function of the failure to apply the theories themselves to the methods of measurement.
The Journal of PsychologyThe Growth and Extinction of Expectancies in Chance Controlled and Skilled Tasks
145 Citations1961Julian B. Rotter, Shephard Liverant +1 more
Journal of Consulting PsychologyPsychopathy, neuroticism, and verbal conditioning.
46 Citations1965Herbert C. Quay, William A. Hunt
The results of this experiment were interpreted as support for the hypothesis that the psychopathic individual is comparatively unresponsive to social reinforcement and related to Cleckley's (1955) concept of Semantic Dementia.