login

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data

The LancetPublished 1 April 2004
Craig Whittington, Timothy J. Kendall, Peter Fonagy, David Cottrell, Andrew Cotgrove, Ellen Boddington
Citations1,062
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score12.11
SNIP22.72

TL;DR

A meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials that evaluated an SSRI versus placebo in participants aged 5-18 years and that were published in a peer-reviewed journal or were unpublished and included in a review by the Committee on Safety of Medicines indicated that risks could outweigh benefits of these drugs to treat depression in children and young people.

Abstract

Published data suggest a favourable risk-benefit profile for some SSRIs; however, addition of unpublished data indicates that risks could outweigh benefits of these drugs (except fluoxetine) to treat depression in children and young people. Clinical guideline development and clinical decisions about treatment are largely dependent on an evidence base published in peer-reviewed journals. Non-publication of trials, for whatever reason, or the omission of important data from published trials, can lead to erroneous recommendations for treatment. Greater openness and transparency with respect to all intervention studies is needed.

Keywords

PsychologyMedicine