MEASURING SUBSKILLS OF READING: INTERCORRELATIONS BETWEEN STANDARDIZED READING TESTS, TEACHERS’ RATINGS, AND READING SPECIALISTS’ RATINGS
Journal of Educational MeasurementPublished 1 March 1971
Roger Farr, PATRICIA ROELKE
Citations12
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.09
SNIP1.58
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The study examined the convergent and discriminant validity of three methods for assessing three subskills of reading: word analysis, vocabulary, and comprehension. These three subskills were measured by teachers’ ratings, specialists’ ratings, and standardized tests. Correlations of all three skills, each measured by the three different methods, were studied by the multi‐trait‐multimethod procedure. Although there was some support for convergent validity, the study revealed a total lack of discriminant validity for any of the three subskills of reading.
Keywords
PsychologySocial SciencesDecision Sciences
Psychological BulletinConvergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
17,061 Citations1959Donald T. Campbell, Donald W. Fiske
This transmutability of the validation matrix argues for the comparisons within the heteromethod block as the most generally relevant validation data, and illustrates the potential interchangeability of trait and method components.
The Journal of Educational ResearchCan We Measure Specific Factors Associated with Reading Comprehension?
20 Citations1957Lyman C. Hunt
Review of Educational ResearchTheoretical Models and Trends toward More Basic Research in Reading
19 Citations1964Jack A. Holmes, Harry Singer
Recognition of the need to search for "undermeanings" is evident in concerted efforts to construct new models that will more faithfully than previous models represent the processes at work in the subsystems or causal chains of events that come to focus in the reading act.
