Response: Science, Public Health, and Objectivity: Research into the Accident at Three Mile Island
Environmental Health PerspectivesPublished 1 June 1997Open access
Steve Wing, David J. Richardson, Donna Armstrong
Citations3
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.57
SNIP1.98
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
In this study, cancer incidence and mortality rates in the tracts most heavily exposed with those less exposed were compared, having taken account of both background radiation and routine plant emissions.
Abstract
Steve Wing, David Richardson, Donna Armstrong, Response: Science, Public Health, and Objectivity: Research into the Accident at Three Mile Island, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 105, No. 6 (Jun., 1997), pp. 567-570
Keywords
Social SciencesMedicine