Emphasis on Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice: Differential Perceptions of Men and Women
Psychological ReportsPublished 1 December 1996
Jasmine Tata, Lynn Bowes‐Sperry
Citations53
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.76
SNIP0.91
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Differences in perceptions of justice may result from differential emphasis on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Correlations were significant between sex of participants and the likelihood of using distributive and interactional justice in the context of decisions about pay raises; men were more likely than women to consider distributive justice, whereas women were more likely than men to consider interactional justice.
Keywords
PsychologySocial SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Advances in experimental social psychologyInequity In Social Exchange
10,489 Citations1965J. Stacy Adams
Critical issues in social justiceThe Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
6,407 Citations1988E. Allan Lind, Tom R. Tyler
Journal of Applied PsychologyRelationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?
3,135 Citations1991Robert H. Moorman
