A test of the Vroom-Yetton model using manager and subordinate reports.
Journal of Applied PsychologyPublished 1 June 1990
Richard Field, Robert J. House
Citations44
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score6.80
SNIP3.33
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Forty-four manager and subordinate pairs reported the situation faced and decision process used in a recent decision. Evidence of the validity of the Vroom-Yetton (1973) model was found with manager data but not subordinate data. This difference may have been due to managers' and subordinates' different roles or to measurement difficulties. Future tests will be required to examine this problem
Keywords
Decision Sciences
University of Pittsburgh Press eBooksLeadership and Decision-Making
2,362 Citations1973Victor H. Vroom, Philip Yetton
Academy of Management ReviewThe New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations
739 Citations1990Mary A. Konovsky, Victor H. Vroom +1 more
Journal of Applied PsychologyOn the validity of the Vroom-Yetton model.
227 Citations1978Victor H. Vroom, Arthur G. Jago