Why We Need Industrial–Organizational Psychology to Fix Industrial–Organizational Psychology
Industrial and Organizational PsychologyPublished 6 August 2013
George C. Banks, Ernest H. O’Boyle
Citations11
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.18
SNIP1.02
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Keywords
PsychologyEconomics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
Academy of Management ReviewInstitutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective
2,073 Citations2002Myeong‐Gu Seo, W. E. Douglas Creed
Personality and Social Psychology ReviewHARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
2,058 Citations1998Norbert L. Kerr
It is conceded that the question of whether HARKing's costs exceed its benefits is a complex one that ought to be addressed through research, open discussion, and debate.
PLoS ONESystematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
1,506 Citations2008Kerry Dwan, Douglas G. Altman +12 more
There is strong evidence of an association between significant results and publication; studies that report positive or significant results are more likely to be published and outcomes that are statistically significant have higher odds of being fully reported.
PLoS ONE“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
750 Citations2010Daniele Fanelli
These results support the scientific status of the social sciences against claims that they are completely subjective, by showing that, when they adopt a scientific approach to discovery, they differ from the natural sciences only by a matter of degree.
Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications
356 Citations2003Barry Gerhart, Sara L. Rynes
Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsComparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials
240 Citations2011Kerry Dwan, Douglas G. Altman +4 more
To systematically review studies of cohorts of RCTs to compare the content of trial reports with the information contained in their protocols, or entries in a trial registry, the quality and extent of information included in trial registries is improved and trialists explain substantial changes in their reports.
Academy of Management Learning and EducationManagement Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors.
179 Citations2010Arthur G. Bedeian, Shannon G. Taylor +1 more
Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewCompensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications
145 Citations2004Joseph J. Martocchio, Barry Gerhart +1 more
Industrial and Organizational PsychologyHow Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology?
126 Citations2013Sven Kepes, Michael A. McDaniel
Journal of Evidence-Based MedicineComparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials
38 Citations2011Kerry Dwan
Discrepancies between protocols or trial registry entries and published reports were common for eligibility criteria; sample size calculations; allocation concealment; blinding; analyses; subgroup analyses; and methods of handling protocol deviations and missing data; as well as for outcomes.
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyNormative arguments and new solutions for the unbiased registration and publication of clinical trials
29 Citations2011Daniel Strech
Empirical data and normative arguments outweigh their counterarguments and present a clear case in favor of an even more restrictive obligation to register trials.