Sample-size salience and statistical inference
Bulletin of the Psychonomic SocietyPublished 1 May 1987Open access
John Murray, Marie Iding, Hilary Farris, Russ Revlin
Citations27
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In this study, students were asked to judge which of two samples was most likely to produce data exceeding the population mean. In two experiments, we examined the importance of the discriminability of the sample sizes for students’ judgments. The findings conflict with claims that students make their judgments based on a representativeness heuristic and support the view that errors reflect inattention to important but nonsalient dimensions of the task.
Keywords
MathematicsArts and Humanities
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
23,088 Citations1975Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
Psychological ReviewOn the psychology of prediction.
6,171 Citations1973Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky
Cognitive PsychologySubjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
4,871 Citations1972Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky
Elsevier eBooksJudgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
2,074 Citations1978Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
Behavioral and Brain SciencesCan human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?
1,225 Citations1981L. Jonathan Cohen
Behavioral and Brain SciencesShould Bayesians sometimes neglect base rates?
57 Citations1981Isaac Levi
