Models for evaluating teaching in consultation-liaison psychiatry
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
This paper reviews the purposes and methodologic requirements of conclusion-oriented research for evaluating outcomes of consultation-liaison (C-L) teaching in psychiatry, and useful guidelines are provided for the educator wishing to conduct conclusion- oriented C-L research to determine teaching effectiveness.
Abstract
This paper reviews the purposes and methodologic requirements of conclusion-oriented research for evaluating outcomes of consultation-liaison (C-L) teaching in psychiatry. Requirements for replicating educational methods and outcomes, and for demonstrating cause-effect relationships between program inputs and program outcomes include: careful definition of educational methods; selection of valid and reliable outcome measures; and use of sound experimental designs. Barriers to meeting these methodologic criteria in C-L settings are identified, and methods for overcoming them are suggested. In addition, useful guidelines are provided for the educator wishing to conduct conclusion-oriented C-L research to determine teaching effectiveness.
