Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors
BMJPublished 26 January 2005Open access
Sara Schroter, Leanne Tite, Richard Smith
Citations136
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Authors consider perceived journal quality as more important than open access when deciding where to submit papers. New journals with open access may need to do more to reassure authors of the quality of their journals.
Keywords
Decision SciencesMedicinePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesResults of a PNAS author survey on an open access option for publication
35 Citations2004Nicholas R. Cozzarelli, Kenneth R. Fulton +1 more
A survey was conducted to determine what fraction of the authors would be willing to pay a surcharge for open access to their work.
NatureHealthy warning: "This journal supports full text, tariff-free archives"
4 Citations2001Colin R. Hopkins