Improving mailed questionnaires: Analysis of a 96 percent return rate
New Directions for Program EvaluationPublished 1 March 1984
James W. Altschuld, Michael A. Lower
Citations23
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract The procedures used in a successful mailed evaluation questionnaire effort are described in this chapter and guidance is given to those who are unfamiliar with the methodology.
Keywords
Social SciencesEnvironmental Science
American Sociological ReviewFactors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature
1,005 Citations1978Thomas A. Heberlein, Robert Baumgartner
American Sociological ReviewIncreasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four State Comparison
198 Citations1974Don A. Dillman, James A. Christenson +2 more
