login

Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation

Published 20 July 2008
Charles L. A. Clarke, Maheedhar Kolla, Gordon V. Cormack, Olga Vechtomova, Azin Ashkan, Stefan Büttcher
Citations951

TL;DR

This paper develops a framework for evaluation that systematically rewards novelty and diversity into a specific evaluation measure, based on cumulative gain, and demonstrates the feasibility of this approach using a test collection based on the TREC question answering track.

Abstract

Evaluation measures act as objective functions to be optimized by information retrieval systems. Such objective functions must accurately reflect user requirements, particularly when tuning IR systems and learning ranking functions. Ambiguity in queries and redundancy in retrieved documents are poorly reflected by current evaluation measures. In this paper, we present a framework for evaluation that systematically rewards novelty and diversity. We develop this framework into a specific evaluation measure, based on cumulative gain. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach using a test collection based on the TREC question answering track.

Keywords

Computer Science