Some Further Evidence on the Effects of Budget Use and Budget Participation on Managerial Perfor Mance
Australian Journal of ManagementPublished 1 June 1987
Mark K. Hirst
Citations19
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.73
SNIP1.07
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In contrast with Brownell (1982), this study shows that the interaction between budget participation and budget emphasis has no effect on overall job perfor Mance. Two alternative ways of reconciling the inconsistent results are discussed. Subjects are 44 managers; and the data are collected using a questionnaire survey.
Keywords
Business, Management and Accounting
Journal of Accounting ResearchJournal of Accounting Research
1,136 Citations2010University of Chicago
Journal of Accounting ResearchAn Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation
896 Citations1972Anthony G. Hopwood
Journal of Accounting ResearchThe Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation, Budgetary Participation, and Organizational Effectiveness
445 Citations1982Peter Brownell
