Privacy, Control, and Talk of Rights
Social Philosophy and PolicyPublished 1 January 2000
R. G. Frey
Citations20
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.18
SNIP0.31
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
An alleged moral right to informational privacy assumes that we should have control over information about ourselves. What is the philosophical justification for this control? I think that one prevalent answer to this question—an answer that has to do with the justification of negative rights generally—will not do.
Keywords
Social SciencesMedicine
The Philosophical ReviewNatural Law and Natural Rights.
1,494 Citations1983William H. Wilcox, John Finnis
The Yale Law JournalFundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning
1,387 Citations1917Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld
DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)The Realm of Rights
425 Citations1990Judith Jarvis Thomson
American Foreign Policy NewsletterThe Human Rights Factor in American Foreign Policy
1 Citations1988Linda Fasulo