Evaluating Presidential Candidates: Who Focuses on Their Personal Attributes?
Public Opinion QuarterlyPublished 1 January 1985
David P. Glass
Citations92
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.72
SNIP1.59
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This article shows that highly educated individuals are more concerned with personal attributes than less educated people. Moreover, both those at the high and low ends of the educational ladder express interest in trivial as well as important aspects of candidates' attributes. Finally, personal attributes have as large an impact on the vote of the best educated as on the vote of the least educated. These findings flatly contradict the standard assumptions about the terms in which educated individuals evaluate presidential candidates.
Keywords
Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
American Political Science ReviewRetrospective Voting in American National Elections. By Morris P. Fiorina. (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981. Pp. xii + 249. $35.00, cloth; $9.95, paper.)
2,496 Citations1982Richard S. Katz
American Political Science ReviewA Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice
682 Citations1979Gregory B. Markus, Philip E. Converse
American Political Science ReviewFrom Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968
309 Citations1972Gerald M. Pomper
American Political Science ReviewThe Simple Act of Voting
256 Citations1974Stanley Kelley, Thad W. Mirer
American Political Science ReviewComment: What Have You Done for Me Lately? Toward An Investment Theory of Voting
198 Citations1976Samuel L. Popkin, John W. Gorman +2 more
American Political Science ReviewThe Levels of Conceptualization: False Measures of Ideological Sophistication
116 Citations1980Eric R. A. N. Smith
American Political Science ReviewIdeology in the 1972 Election: Myth or Reality—A Rejoinder
106 Citations1976Arthur H. Miller, Warren E. Miller
Leadership and change : presidential elections from 1952 to 1976
59 Citations1976Warren E. Miller, Teresa E. Levitin
Public Opinion QuarterlyCandidate Evaluations by Men and Women
49 Citations1979Goldie Shabad, Kristi Andersen
American Journal of Political ScienceConceptualization and Party Identification: 1956-1976
22 Citations1982John C. Pierce, Paul R. Hagner
