login

Job Matching and On-the-Job Training

Journal of Labor EconomicsPublished 1 January 1989
John M. Barron, Dan A. Black, Mark A. Loewenstein
Citations330
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score6.40
SNIP2.95

Abstract

Conventional analysis predicts that workers pay part of their on-the-job training costs by accepting a lower starting wage and subsequently realize a return to this investment in the form of greater wage growth. Missing from the conventional treatment of on-the-job training is a discussion of the process by which heterogeneous worker s are matched to jobs requiring varying amounts of training. This matching process constitutes a key feature of the on-the-job training model that is presented in this article and tested with a unique dat a set containing extensive information concerning on-the-job training, employer search, wages, and wage and productivity growth. Copyright 1989 by University of Chicago Press.

Keywords

Economics, Econometrics and Finance