Responses of three bottomland species with different flood tolerance capabilities to various flooding regimes
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Seedlings of baldcypress (Taxodium distichum), nuttall oak (Quercus nuttalli), and cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var.pagodaefolia) were subjected to four flooding treatments: control, continuously flooded, intermittently flooded, and partially flooded for 70 days in a greenhouse. The treatments imposed various durations and intensities of soil redox potential (Eh) conditions representing a range encountered by plants in their habitats. Morphological changes and gas exchange responses to the treatments differed among the study species. Rapid development of adventitious root and hypertrophied lenticels were observed in baldcypress and nuttall oak under all flooded treatments. Cherrybark oak had the highest percentage reduction in net photosynthesis ranging from 65–87%, whereas reductions in nuttall oak ranged between 35–68% and in baldcypress between 6–21% in response to various treatments. Recovery of gas exchange was noted in baldcypress but no significant recovery was found in oaks. The recovery in baldcypress contributed to the continued growth and biomass accumulation under various treatments. Little evidence of consistent changes in biomass allocation patterns in response to the treatments was found in baldcypress but total biomass decreased significantly under the continuously flooded treatment. In oaks, total biomass decreased significantly in all flooded treatments. The present findings demonstrated that physiological functions are adversely affected by low soil Eh conditions and the extent of such effects are dependent on the intensity and duration of soil reduction as well as the species' capability to respond to such conditions rapidly. Management plans concerned with regeneration of bottomland forested ecosystems should consider the species flood response capabilities at seedling stages as well as the timing, durations, and intensities of soil reduction at the specific site.
