login

Perlocutions: The Achilles' heel of speech act theory

Journal of PragmaticsPublished 1 November 2000
Daniel Marcu
Citations40
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.21
SNIP1.91

Abstract

This paper criticizes previous approaches to perlocutions and previous formalizations of perlocutionary effects of communicative actions by showing that some of their fundamental assumptions are inconsistent with data from communication studies, psychology, and social studies of persuasion. Consequently, it argues for a data-driven approach to pragmatics, one that permits pragmatic theories to be falsified and improved. The paper also offers an introductory account of a formal theory that can explain the difference in persuasiveness between messages that are characterized by the same set of locutionary and illocutionary acts; and the difference in persuasiveness of the same message with respect to different hearers. The formal theory is developed using the language of situation calculus.

Keywords

Computer ScienceArts and HumanitiesPhysics and Astronomy