Effect of camera performance on diagnostic accuracy: preliminary results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial

The diagnostic accuracy of realtime teledermatology was measured using two different video cameras and it is suggested that the performance of the more expensive camera was superior for realtime telemedicine.

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of realtime teledermatology was measured using two different video cameras. One camera was a relatively low-cost, single-chip device (camera 1), while the other was a more expensive, three-chip camera (camera 2). The diagnosis obtained via the videolink was compared with the diagnosis made in person. Sixty-five new patients referred to a dermatology clinic were examined using camera 1 followed by a standard face-to-face consultation on the same day. A further 65 patients were examined using camera 2 and the same procedure implemented. Seventy-six per cent of conditions were correctly diagnosed by telemedicine using camera 2 compared with 62% using camera 1. A working differential diagnosis was obtained in 12% of cases using camera 2 compared with 14% using camera 1. The percentage of 'no diagnosis', wrong and missed diagnoses was halved using camera 2 compared with camera 1. These results suggest that the performance of the more expensive camera was superior for realtime teledermatology.