Successive h-indices
ScientometricsPublished 1 January 2007
A. Schubert
Citations126
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.15
SNIP1.82
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
It is suggested that h-indices themselves may form the basis of a series of h-Indices at successively higher levels of aggregation.
Abstract
Abstract It is suggested that h-indices themselves may form the basis of a series of h-indices at successively higher levels of aggregation. The concept of successive h-indices may usefully contribute to develop a coherent frame for multi-level assessments.
Keywords
Computer Science
Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesAn index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
11,535 Citations2005J. E. Hirsch
The index hbar, defined as the number of papers of an individual that have citation count larger than or equal to the citation count of all coauthors of each paper, is proposed as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher that takes into account the effect of multiple authorship.
ScientometricsA Hirsch-type index for journals
670 Citations2006Tibor Braun, Wolfgang Glänzel +1 more
It is suggested that a h-type index - equal to h if you have published h papers, each of which has at least h citations - would be a useful supplement to journal impact factors.
Lirias (KU Leuven)A Hirsch-type index for journals [1]
150 Citations2005Tibor Braun, Wolfgang Glänzel +1 more
arXiv (Cornell University)An index to quantify an individual's scientific output
72 Citations2005J. E. Hirsch