login

What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography

Journal of Vascular SurgeryPublished 1 February 2005Open access
Mary V. Parker, Sean O'donnell, Audrey S. Chang, Chatt A. Johnson, David L. Gillespie, James M. Goff
Citations72
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.08
SNIP2.00
View PDF

TL;DR

As a single imaging modality, 3D CT appears to have the best correlation for both diameters and lengths; however, the difference is not sufficient enough to alter endograft selection.

Abstract

Reproducible and comparable measures of diameter and length can be obtained by each of three imaging modalities available for endograft sizing. As a single imaging modality, 3D CT appears to have the best correlation for both diameters and lengths; however, the difference is not sufficient enough to alter endograft selection. Three-dimensional CT may be reserved for challenging aortic anatomy where small differences in measurements would affect patient or graft selection for EVAR.

Keywords

Medicine