The Dynamics of Organizational Status
Industrial and Corporate ChangePublished 1 January 1996
Joel M. Podolny, Damon J. Phillips
Citations338
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.28
SNIP1.57
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper examines the growth (and decline) of organizational status. It is argued that an organization's status is determined by two factors: past performance outcomes and the status of the organization's affiliates. The better the past performance outcomes and the higher the status of the affiliates, the greater the organization's growth in status. This basic proposition is tested in an examination of status changes among investment banks in the non-investment grade market between 1981 and 1987. Implications and extensions are discussed in the conclusion.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
Administrative Science QuarterlyMarket Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange
1,324 Citations1994Joel M. Podolny
American Journal of SociologyA Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990
731 Citations1994David Barron, Elizabeth West +1 more
American Journal of SociologyA Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change
559 Citations1995Joel M. Podolny, Toby E. Stuart
