On Comparing Alternative Segmentation Schemes: The List of Values (LOV) and Values and Life Styles (VALS)
Journal of Consumer ResearchPublished 1 June 1990
Thomas Novak, Bruce MacEvoy
Citations191
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score8.56
SNIP3.32
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This article begins with a partial replication of previous work—a comparison of the Values and Life Styles (VALS) system and the List of Values (LOV). The analysis is then extended to evaluate the role of a set of standard demographic variables with respect to both psychographic segmentation systems.
Keywords
PsychologyDecision SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Wiley series in probability and statisticsStatistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
18,048 Citations2003Joseph L. Fleiss, Bruce Levin +1 more
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General)Applied Linear Statistical Models.
2,299 Citations1975V. Barnett, John Neter +1 more
Psychological BulletinA variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot.
1,008 Citations1985Robert P. Abelson
Journal of Educational PsychologyA simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.
932 Citations1982Robert Rosenthal, Donald B. Rubin
Journal of Consumer ResearchAlternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values (LOV) and Values and Life Style (VALS)
708 Citations1986Lynn R. Kahle, Sharon E. Beatty +1 more
