A comparison of methods for increasing power in randomized between-subjects designs.
Psychological BulletinPublished 1 September 1991
Scott E. Maxwell, David A. Cole, Richard D. Arvey, Eduardo Salas
Citations37
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score8.70
SNIP8.94
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Power in a randomized between-subjects design can be enhanced by increasing sample size or increasing alpha level. This article compares 2 other methods of increasing power by reducing within-group error. (a) by adding a pretest to the design and using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and (b) by increasing the length of the posttest and using analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Keywords
Psychology
Computers Environment and Urban SystemsStatistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
65,645 Citations1990
Medical Entomology and ZoologyExperimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research
15,238 Citations1963Donald T. Campbell, Julian C. Stanley +1 more
TechnometricsData Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach
940 Citations1992Geoff Vining, Charles M. Judd +1 more
Training and development in organizations
533 Citations1989Irwin L. Goldstein
Data Analysis for Research Designs : Analysis of Variance and Multiple Regression/correlation Approaches
355 Citations1989Geoffrey Keppel, Sheldon Zedeck
Psychological BulletinUnreliability of difference scores: A paradox for measurement of change.
205 Citations1975John E. Overall, J. Arthur Woodward
American Educational Research JournalThe Reliability of Observational Measures
71 Citations1976Glenn Rowley
The work of Medley and Mitzel (1963) and McGaw, Wardrop and Bunda (1972) has clearly established the inadequacy of observer agreements alone as indices of reliability.
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical PsychologyERROR OF MEASUREMENT AND THE POWER OF A STATISTICAL TEST
66 Citations1969T. Anne Cleary, Robert L. Linn
Applied Psychological MeasurementSome Comments on the Relation Between Reliability and Statistical Power
35 Citations1989Lloyd G. Humphreys, Fritz Drasgow
Applied Psychological MeasurementContradictions Can Never a Paradox Resolve
23 Citations1989John E. Overall
Applied Psychological MeasurementParadoxes, Contradictions, and Illusions
13 Citations1989Lloyd G. Humphreys, Fritz Drasgow
Applied Psychological MeasurementDistinguishing Between Measurements and Dependent Variables
13 Citations1989John E. Overall
