An Alternative Method of Fitting a Model of Individual Differences in Multidimensional Scaling
PsychometrikaPublished 1 September 1974
Bruce Bloxom
Citations7
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.90
SNIP2.06
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In articles by Homn [1969] and Carroll and Chang [1970] and in a memorandum by Bloxom [1968], a model was proposed for individual differences in multidimensional scaling. The distance in a p -dimensional space between stimuli j and k for person i is assumed to be given by for N persons and for all pairs of n stimuli, where w im , is the “weight” given to axis m by person i and a jm , is the projection of stimulus j on that axis.
Keywords
Mathematics
PsychometrikaAnalysis of Individual Differences in Multidimensional Scaling Via an N-way Generalization of “Eckart-Young” Decomposition
4,716 Citations1970J. Douglas Carroll, Jih-Jie Chang
Introduction to Matrix Analysis
2,970 Citations1960Richard Bellman
PsychometrikaMultidimensional Scaling: Combining Observations when Individuals have Different Perceptual Structures
149 Citations1969Catherin Horan
ETS Research Bulletin SeriesINDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING*
66 Citations1968Bruce Bloxom
This paper presents a formal description of Tucker and Messick's model of individual differences in multidimensional scaling and a least squares solution for its parameters.