Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model Version 1.1
KiltHub RepositoryPublished 1 January 1993Open access
Mark C. Paulk, Charles V. Weber, Suzanne Garcia, Mary Beth Chrissis, Marilyn W. Bush
Citations293
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This document provides the key practices that correspond to each maturity level of the Capability Maturity Model and information on how to interpret the key practices. It is an elaboration of what is meant by maturity at each level of the CMM and a guide that can be used for software process improvement, software process assessments, and software capability evaluations.
Keywords
Computer Science
CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)Managing the Software Process
1,975 Citations1989Watts S. Humphrey
This work describes the development of a Software Maturity Framework and the Principles of Software Process Change, and describes the management of this framework.
IEEE SoftwareCharacterizing the software process: a maturity framework
659 Citations1988Watts S. Humphrey
A description is given of a software-process maturity framework that has been developed to provide the US Department of Defense with a means to characterize the capabilities of software-development organizations and a framework for assessing these organizations and identifying the priority areas for immediate improvement.
IEEE Transactions on Software EngineeringAdvances in software inspections
627 Citations1986Michael Fagan
Studies and experiences are presented which enhance the use of the inspection process and improve its contribution to development of defect-free software on time and at lower cost.
International Conference on Software EngineeringAn analysis of SEI software process assessment results: 1987–1991
76 Citations1993David H. Kitson, Stephen M. Masters
Software Engineering Process Group Guide
72 Citations1990Priscilla Fowler, Stan Rifkin
The process group works with line organizations to improve process quality by helping to assess current status, plan and implement improvements, and transfer technology to facilitate improvement in practice.