The relative efficacy of covert modeling procedures and guided participant modeling on the reduction of avoidance behavior

Abstract

The present study compared the effectiveness of two covert modeling procedures with guided participant modeling (GPM) and a delayed treatment control. Avoidance behavior was assessed using a behavior test, fear reports, and Fear Survey Schedule ratings. Results indicated greater improvements for the GPM condition than for all other conditions. The difference in approach behavior between covert modeling groups and the control group was of borderline significance. Subsequent reassignment of unsuccessful subjects to GPM treatment produced gains comparable to the original GPM group. The theoretical significance and clinical application of these findings are discussed.