login

Further investigations of inhibitory mechanisms in attention

Memory & CognitionPublished 1 January 1985Open access
Douglas G. Lowe
Citations93
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.15
SNIP1.32
View PDF

TL;DR

Three experiments employed a discrete-trials version of the Stroop task to investigate further the claim that there are inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention, and suggested that the suppression effect does not index attentional inhibition, but may be attributed to a problem of code coordination.

Abstract

Three experiments employed a discrete-trials version of the Stroop task to investigate further the claim that there are inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention (Neill, 1977). The results indicated that the evidence supporting the inhibitory theory (i.e., the diminished availability of distractor responses) cannot be explained by subjects’ attempts to physically match successive stimuli (Lowe, 1979). In light of all the available evidence, it was suggested that the suppression effect does not index attentional inhibition, but may be attributed to a problem of code coordination (Keele & Neill, 1978).

Keywords

PsychologyNeuroscience