Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
To compare citation history and contextual “importance”, eleven highly cited articles were ranked using an aggregate citation context measure, the Mean Utility Index, and a Type 1 paper representing an important theoretical concept could not be distinguished from Type 2 papers using citation context alone.
Abstract
To compare citation history and contextual "importance", eleven highly cited articles, 4 slowly aging (Type 1) and 7 quickly aging (Type 2), were ranked using an aggregate citation context measure, the Mean Utility Index. Based on citations in late (PY 6 & 7) source articles, "methods" papers consistently ranked higher than papers cited for research results and theoretical implications, and Type 1 methods papers ranked above all Type 2 papers. A Type 1 paper representing an important theoretical concept could not be distinguished from Type 2 papers using citation context alone.
