Re: The Seven Deadly Sins of Statistical Analysis
Annals of Plastic SurgeryPublished 1 January 1997
William M. Kuzon, Melanie G. Urbanchek, Steven J. McCabe
Citations181
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.60
SNIP0.92
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Kuzon, William M. Jr. MD*; Urbanchek, Melanie PhD*; McCabe, Steven MD† Author Information
Keywords
Decision SciencesMedicine
Revue économiqueNonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
35,492 Citations1958Henri Guitton, Sidney Siegel
BMJThe scandal of poor medical research
872 Citations1994D G Altman
The authors need less research, better research, and research done for the right reasons, and researchers who use the wrong techniques, use the right techniques wrongly, misinterpret their results, report their results selectively, cite the literature selectively, and draw unjustified conclusions.
Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeryStatistical Analysis and Study Design in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Research
5 Citations1987Vic Velanovich, Martin C. Robson +3 more
Although there were no differences in the types of statistical analysis errors, there were differences inThe types of study design errors, and the causes of these discrepancies may lie in the nature of plastic surgery.