Ethics in quasi‐experimental research on people with severe learning disabilities: dilemmas and compromises
British Journal of Learning DisabilitiesPublished 1 June 2001
Mary Kellett, Melanie Nind
Citations47
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.44
SNIP0.87
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Summary The present paper follows up the theme of research ethics that has been discussed in the British Journal of Learning Disabilities in recent years. We join the debate in the capacity of people involved in doing research on, rather than with, people with learning disabilities. We focus on our own quasi‐experimental study evaluating the Intensive Interaction approach for pupils who are preverbal. We question our own practice, and illustrate some of the dilemmas which we have faced in our research and some of the compromises which we have reached.
Keywords
PsychologySocial SciencesMedicine
Disability Handicap & SocietyChanging the Social Relations of Research Production?
1,094 Citations1992Mike Oliver
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationDesign and Analysis of Time-Series Experiments.
598 Citations1976Paul Newbold, Gene V. Glass +2 more
Disability & SocietySome Ethical and Methodological Issues in Research with People with Learning Difficulties
313 Citations1998Kirsten Stalker
Disability & SocietyThe Researched Opinions on Research: Disabled people and disability research
311 Citations2000Rob Kitchin
The opinions of disabled people mirror quite strongly the recent arguments forwarded by disabled academics concerning the need for emancipatory and empowering research strategies, including a need for inclusive, action-based research strategies.
Disability Handicap & SocietyPersonal and Political: A Feminist Perspective on Researching Physical Disability
276 Citations1992Jenny Morris
British Journal of Learning DisabilitiesParticipation in Research by People with Learning Disability: Origins and Issues
140 Citations1999Chris Kiernan
Disability & SocietyWorking with the Experts: Collaborative research with people with an intellectual disability
131 Citations2000Marie Knox, Magdalena Mo Ching Mok +1 more
Access to Communication: Developing the Basics of Communication with People with Severe Learning Difficulties Through Intensive Interaction
116 Citations1994Melanie Nind, Dave Hewett
European Journal of Special Needs EducationEfficacy of Intensive Interaction: developing sociability and communication in people with severe and complex learning difficulties using an approach based on caregiver‐infant interaction
88 Citations1996Melanie Nind
Paul Chapman eBooksArticulating with difficulty : research voices in inclusive education
85 Citations1998Peter Clough, Len Barton
British Journal of Learning DisabilitiesPractising Partnership: Involving People with Learning Difficulties in Research
74 Citations1998Linda Ward, Ken Simons
PubMedMultiple-baseline design in instructional research: pitfalls of measurement and procedural advantages.
67 Citations1979Anthony J. Cuvo
The advantage of using the multiple-baseline design to study covariation of responding was highlighted and the pitfalls of measurement may arise because of the direct interpersonal nature of measuring the dependent variable in instructional research.
British Journal of Special EducationResearch Section: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intensive Interactive Teaching with Pupils with Profound and Complex Learning Difficulties
37 Citations1997J. Wreford Watson, Anne Fisher
Whose Choice?
8 Citations2018Judith Coupe-O’Kane
British Journal of Special EducationResearch Section: Research in Special Needs Education: Objectivity or Ideology?
6 Citations1998Stacy W. Gray, Pam Denicolo
