Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign
PLoS MedicinePublished 3 December 2013Open access
Daniele Fanelli
Citations270
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.28
SNIP3.21
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
In a new Essay in the Research Integrity Series, Daniele Fanelli examines the evidence and possible reasons for the rising number of retractions.
Abstract
In a new Essay in the Research Integrity Series, Daniele Fanelli examines the evidence and possible reasons for the rising number of retractions.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision Sciences
PLoS ONEHow Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
1,944 Citations2009Daniele Fanelli
Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words “falsification” or “fabrication”, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct, and when these factors were controlled for, misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others.
Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesMisconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
1,222 Citations2012Ferric C. Fang, R. Grant Steen +1 more
A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error, compared with 67.4% attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud, duplicate publication, and plagiarism.
ScientometricsNegative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
1,217 Citations2011Daniele Fanelli
PLoS ONEDo Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
807 Citations2010Daniele Fanelli
The hypothesis that competitive academic environments increase not only scientists' productivity but also their bias is verified, which might be observed in other countries where academic competition and pressures to publish are high.
Journal of Medical EthicsRetractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
407 Citations2010R. Grant Steen
Levels of misconduct appear to be higher than in the past, which may reflect either a real increase in the incidence of fraud or a greater effort on the part of journals to police the literature.
PLoS ONEWhy Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
407 Citations2013R. Grant Steen, Arturo Casadevall +1 more
Lower barriers to publication of flawed articles are seen in the increase in number and proportion of retractions by authors with a single retraction and an increase in retraction for “new” offenses such as plagiarism and a decrease in the time-to-retraction of flawed work.
Infection and ImmunityRetracted Science and the Retraction Index
405 Citations2011Ferric C. Fang, Arturo Casadevall
Using a novel measure that is called the “retraction index,” it is found that the frequency of retraction varies among journals and shows a strong correlation with the journal impact factor.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and TechnologyIntended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey
360 Citations2012H.P. van Dalen, Kène Henkens
PLoS ONEA Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature
348 Citations2012Michael L. Grieneisen, Minghua Zhang
The scope and characteristics of retracted articles across the full spectrum of scholarly disciplines were surveyed, and 15 prolific individuals accounted for more than half of all retractions due to alleged research misconduct, and strongly influenced all retraction characteristics.
Journal of Medical EthicsWhy and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008
261 Citations2011Elizabeth Wager, Peter Williams
Journals' retraction practices are not uniform and some retractions fail to state the reason, and therefore fail to distinguish error from misconduct, which is used to inform guidelines on retractions.
ScienceChanging Incentives to Publish
240 Citations2011Chiara Franzoni, Giuseppe Scellato +1 more
The decline in the relative performance of the United States relates to increased international competition engendered by newly adopted incentives that have crowded out some work by U.S. authors.
Journal of Medical EthicsRetractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
216 Citations2010R. Grant Steen
The results suggest that papers retracted because of data fabrication or falsification represent a calculated effort to deceive, and it is inferred that such behaviour is neither naïve, feckless nor inadvertent.
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological ResearchThe growing competition in Brazilian science: rites of passage, stress and burnout
190 Citations2003Leopoldo de Meis, Andréa Velloso +3 more
Interviews with graduate students, post-doctoral fellows and professors in one university department with a strong research tradition illustrate the level of stress engendered by the conflict between increasing competition and diminishing resources, and serve to underscore the negative effects on creativity and on the tendency to choose science as a career.
PLoS MedicineResearch Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
156 Citations2013Joseph Ana, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos +2 more
What is currently known about research misconduct in low- and middle-income countries is laid out, with some high profile cases summarized and suggestions on ways forward.
ScientometricsWorsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
135 Citations2010Marco Pautasso
The file-drawer problem is the tendency of journals to preferentially publish studies with statistically significant results that can lead to enhanced bias in meta-analysis and hence to a distorted picture of the evidence for or against a certain hypothesis.
Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesUS studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
131 Citations2013Daniele Fanelli, John P. A. Ioannidis
This work extracted primary outcomes appearing in 82 meta-analyses published in health-related biological and behavioral research sampled from the Web of Science categories Genetics & Heredity and Psychiatry and measured how individual results deviated from the overall summary effect size within their respective meta-analysis.
Oxford University Press eBooksA Dictionary of English Manuscript Terminology 1450–2000
129 Citations2008Peter Beal
A Dictionary of English Manuscript Terminology 1450-2000 Select Bibliography shows how changes in usage over the centuries have changed the meaning of the word " manuscript" to "book".
mBioMales Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct
97 Citations2013Ferric C. Fang, Joan W. Bennett +1 more
Analysis of the United States Office of Research Integrity annual reports revealed that misconduct occurred across the entire career spectrum from trainee to senior scientist and that two-thirds of the individuals found to have committed misconduct were male, which exceeds the overall proportion of males among life science trainees and faculty.
Journal of Medical EthicsScientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
93 Citations2012David B. Resnik, Gregg E. Dinse
Among the published statements in response to an official finding of misconduct (within the time frame studied), the proportion that mentioned ethics was significantly higher in recent years than in earlier years, as was theportion that named a specific problem.
The LancetGuidance on research integrity: no union in Europe
85 Citations2013Simon Godecharle, Benoît Nemery +1 more
Science and Engineering EthicsExploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study
84 Citations2011Peter Williams, Elizabeth Wager
Interviewing editors of science journals using semi-structured interviews identified potential barriers to retraction, difficulties in the process and also sources of support and encouragement.
ScienceGlobal Research Integrity Training
61 Citations2013Nicholas H. Steneck
Beneath the surface of visible cases, the underlying structure supporting the responsible conduct of research (RCR) has significant flaws.
Accountability in ResearchResearch Misconduct Policies of Social Science Journals and Impact Factor
57 Citations2010David B. Resnik, Daniel Patrone +1 more
Impact factor of the journal was the only variable significantly associated with whether a journal had a formal misconduct policy with an odds-ratio of 1.72 (p < 0.01).
Nucleic Acids ResearchDeja vu: a database of highly similar citations in the scientific literature
56 Citations2008Mounir Errami, Zhaohui Sun +3 more
Déjà vu is made available, a publicly available database of highly similar Medline citations identified by the text similarity search engine eTBLAST, which helps authors and editors to identify highly similar citations, which sometimes may represent cases of unethical duplication.
Relations industriellesPublication Bias in Union-Productivity Research?
49 Citations2005Hristos Doucouliagos, Patrice Laroche +1 more
ScientometricsThe dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems
45 Citations2011Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero +1 more
Using a 5 year bibliometric analysis conducted on all Italian universities active in the hard sciences from 2004 to 2008, this work analyzes the distribution of publications and relevant citations by scientists within the universities, measures the research performance of individual scientists, and quantifies the intensity of concentration of top scientists at each university.
Accountability in ResearchResearch Misconduct Policies of Scientific Journals
38 Citations2009David B. Resnik, Shyamal D. Peddada +1 more
The research indicates that more than half of scientific journals have developed misconduct policies, but that most of these policies do not define research misconduct and most ofThese policies were not generated by the journal.
mBioAre Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
37 Citations2013Anna Kaatz, Paul N. Vogelman +1 more
The review of records from the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) found more cases of scientific misconduct committed by men than women, particularly by faculty, and concluded that scientific misconduct, regardless of who commits it, diminishes all who contribute to the scientific enterprise.
Psychological MedicineLetter to the Editor: Bias in genetic association studies: effects of research location and resources
33 Citations2008Marcus R. Munafò, Angela Attwood +1 more
ScienceShaking Up Science
21 Citations2013Jennifer Couzin-Frankel
Ferric Fang and Arturo Casadevall are an unlikely duo that disenchantment brought together, exploring scientists' dependence on grants to pay their salaries and questioning proposed changes to peer review.