Social Desirability in Measures of Subjective Well-being: a Systematic Evaluation

The present investigation addressed the problem of a social desirability response bias in measures of psychological well-being and results suggest that the high zero-order correlations between measures of well- Being and the Edwards scale are more readily attributed to content similarity between the Edwards Scale and measures ofWell-being.

Abstract

The present investigation addressed the problem of a social desirability response bias in measures of psychological well-being. Data on 150 people, between the ages of 50 and 82, yielded high correlations between three measures of well-being (the MUNSH, the LSI-Z, and the PGC) and the Edwards Social Desirability Scale, but only moderate ones between well-being scales and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Part correlations between well-being measures and an external criterion of happiness, controlling for social desirability, failed to improve on the zero-order criterion/well-being relationship. Controlling for social desirability, therefore, does not enhance the construct validity of well-being scales. These and related results suggest that the high zero-order correlations between measures of well-being and the Edwards scale are more readily attributed to content similarity between the Edwards scale and measures of well-being than to a social desirability response bias in well-being measures.