The Ability of Professional Standards to Mitigate Aggressive Reporting.
The Accounting ReviewPublished 1 April 1995
Andrew D. Cuccia, Karl E. Hackenbrack, Mark W. Nelson
Citations168
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.04
SNIP2.76
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract Investigates whether replacing a standard that employs a vague, verbal disclosure threshold with a standard that employs a more stringent numerical threshold mitigates the aggressiveness of reporting decisions in accounting. Performance in a tax setting; Effect of incentives on the interpretation of vague standards.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
Academy of Management ReviewA Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies
926 Citations1978Lee Roy Beach, Terence R. Mitchell
National Tax JournalFISCAL INEQUITY AND TAX EVASION: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH
465 Citations1980Michael W. Spicer, LEE A. BECKER
Journal of Accounting ResearchDebiasing Audit Judgment with Accountability: A Framework and Experimental Results
387 Citations1993Jane Kennedy
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesEffects of justification and a mechanical aid on judgment performance
245 Citations1992Robert H. Ashton
Journal of money credit and bankingGood Intentions and Unintended Evil: The Case Against Selective Credit Allocation
205 Citations1977Edward J. Kane
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologySocial and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering.
196 Citations1989Philip E. Tetlock, Linda J. Skitka +1 more
Law & Society ReviewA Study of Admitted Income Tax Evasion
152 Citations1978Robert Mason, Lyle D. Calvin
Journal of Public EconomicsTax evasion and heuristics
138 Citations1985Michael W. Spicer, Rodney E. Hero
UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)The auditors' going concern opinion decision: Interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence.
125 Citations1989Stephen Kwaku Asare
Journal of Accounting ResearchPressure And Performance In Accounting Decision Settings - Paradoxical Effects Of Incentives, Feedback, And Justification
104 Citations1990Rh Ashton
Journal of Accounting ResearchThe Impact of Group Processing on Selected Audit Disclosure Decisions
93 Citations1981Joseph J. Schultz, Philip M.J. Reckers
Journal of Accounting and Public PolicyTaxpayer compliance under uncertainty
83 Citations1989Paul J. Beck, Woon‐Oh Jung
Contemporary Accounting ResearchJudging the probability of a contingent loss: An empirical study*
52 Citations1989KENNETH E. HARRISON, Lawrence A. Tomassini
Contemporary Accounting ResearchAuditor evaluation of loss contingencies*
40 Citations1991K. Raghunandan, Richard A. Grimlund +1 more
Juror Decisions and the Determination of Guilt in Capital Punishment Cases: A Bayesian Perspective
18 Citations1975Catherine R. Marshall, James A. Wise
Journal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancyDealing with Shades of Gray: The Realistic Possibility Standard
8 Citations1993D. Brent Bandy, Andrew J. Judd +1 more
