Measuring the societal impact of research
EMBO ReportsPublished 10 July 2012Open access
Lutz Bornmann
Citations255
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.76
SNIP1.24
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The global financial crisis has changed how nations and agencies prioritize research investment. There has been a push towards science with expected benefits for society, yet devising reliable tools to predict and measure the social impact of research remains a major challenge.
Keywords
Decision Sciences
Research PolicyThe economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review
1,348 Citations2001Ammon Salter, Ben R. Martin
Research EvaluationThe Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster?
459 Citations2011Ben R. Martin
EMBO ReportsThe state of h index research
396 Citations2008Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel
Owing to the availability and utility of the IF, promotion committees, funding agencies and scientists have taken to using it as a shorthand assessment of the quality of scientists or institutions, rather than only journals.
MinervaPublic Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation
287 Citations2011Barry Bozeman, Daniel Sarewitz
NatureMetrics: Do metrics matter?
258 Citations2010A. H. A. Abbott, David Cyranoski +4 more
Nature probes to what extent metrics are really used that way, and whether quantitative metrics determine who gets hired and who gets promoted at institutions.
Rheumatology InternationalDiversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics
182 Citations2011Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx +2 more
Some newer alternative journal metrics such as SCImago Journal Rank and the h-index are presented and examples of their application in several subject categories are analyzed and misuses of JIF are discussed.
Research EvaluationState of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue
161 Citations2011Colleen Donovan
BMJMeasuring the social impact of research
147 Citations2001Richard Smith
A committee of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences is trying to devise a way of measuring the social impact of applied health research, and plans to experiment with methods of measuring social impact.
Research EvaluationPeer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts
135 Citations2011J. Britt Holbrook, Robert Frodeman
New Directions for EvaluationThe Australian Research Quality Framework: A live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental, and cultural returns of publicly funded research
121 Citations2008Claire Donovan
Science and Public PolicyPeer review and the relevance gap: ten suggestions for policy-makers
116 Citations2007Paul Nightingale, Alister Scott
Research EvaluationMeasuring research performance during a changing relationship between science and society
61 Citations2011Erik Ernø-Kjølhede, Finn Hansson
EvaluationEvaluating the Benefits from Health Research and Development Centres
56 Citations2000Steve Hanney, Tim Packwood +1 more
A multidimensional categorization of benefits, or payback, from research and development (R&D) and a model for conducting evaluations of impact were used during an assessment of two R&D centres funded by a regional office of the National Health Service in the UK.
Research EvaluationEvaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands
52 Citations2000Barend van der Meulen, Arie Rip
ScientometricsMimicry in science?
46 Citations2010Lutz Bornmann
Since bibliometric indicators have obtained a general acceptance in science policy and attained applied relevance in research evaluation, feedback effects on scientists’ behaviour resulting from the use of these indicators for science funding decisions have been reported.
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Evaluating the societal relevance of academic research: A guide
33 Citations2010B. van der Meulen
BMC Public HealthDevelopment of a practical tool to measure the impact of publications on the society based on focus group discussions with scientists
31 Citations2011Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Thomas E. Dorner +1 more
Focus group discussions with scientists suggested that the societal impact factor of a publication should consider the effect of the publication in a wide set of non-scientific areas, but also the motivation behind the publication, and efforts by the authors to translate their findings.