Why are there so few? (creative women: Visual artists, mathematicians, musicians)
Roeper ReviewPublished 1 April 1991
Jane Piirto
Citations118
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.61
SNIP0.95
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The author rethinks a position she and Higham took in 1984 in an article in Journal For The Education of the Gifted, where she and Higham called for “differential equality” in the education of gifted girls. Looking again at well‐known psychometric, psychological, and biographical research into creative visual artists, mathematicians, and musicians, she examines these studies in terms of gender differences, and relates those findings to the developmental research now being done on girls.
Keywords
PsychologySocial SciencesArts and Humanities
Curriculum InquiryWomen's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind
4,960 Citations1988Anne-Louise Brookes, Mary Field Belenky +3 more
Choice Reviews OnlineMaking connections: the relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School
613 Citations1990
Choice Reviews OnlineWomen, art, and power: and other essays
200 Citations1989López Fernández, Mª Ángeles
journal for the education of the giftedGifted Adolescent Females Require Differential Treatment
18 Citations1984Sharon J. Higham, Jane Navarre
