Allocation of Attention During Reading
Advances in psychologyPublished 1 January 1982
Richard C. Anderson
Citations93
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper examines the theory that important text information is better learned than less important information because readers devote more attention to important information. Previous research showing that more attention is paid to important information is inconclusive because the extra attention could be an epiphenomenon. New research indicates that attention is on the causal path between adjunct questions and learning, but is not on the causal path between the interestingness of the material and learning.
Keywords
Psychology
Psychological ReviewToward a model of text comprehension and production.
5,035 Citations1978Walter Kintsch, Teun A. van Dijk
The semantic structure of texts can be described both at the local microlevel and at a more global macrolevel, and a model for text comprehension based on this notion accounts for the formation of a coherent semantic text base in terms of a cyclical process constrained by limitations of working memory.
Psychological ReviewA theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.
3,847 Citations1980Marcel Adam Just, Patricia A. Carpenter
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorRecall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective
1,003 Citations1978Richard C. Anderson, James W. Pichert
Journal of Educational PsychologyTaking different perspectives on a story.
569 Citations1977James W. Pichert, Richard C. Anderson
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorStructural components of reading time
202 Citations1980Arthur C. Graesser, Nicholas L. Hoffman +1 more
Findings suggest that functionally separate reading skills may be involved in microstructure versus macrostructure processing, which includes the processing of words, syntax, and propositions.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorText structure and reading time for sentences
176 Citations1980Randolph K. Cirilo, Donald J. Foss
Journal of Educational PsychologyInfluence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading.
150 Citations1982Ralph E. Reynolds, Richard C. E. Anderson
Text information relevant to questions was learned better than text information irrelevant to questions and reading times and probe reaction times on a secondary task were longer when subjects were processing text segments containing information of the type addressed by questions.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorThe episode schema in story processing
103 Citations1980Karl Haberlandt, Claire Berian +1 more
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorAn evaluation of alternative functional models of narrative schemata
93 Citations1981Frank R. Yekovich, Perry W. Thorndyke
It is suggested that subjects retain lexical information in memory, and narrative schemata provide a frame work for encoding all text propositions, and these Schemata are hierarchically organized and used for top-down retrieval of information at output time.
Memory & CognitionReading and cognitive capacity usage: Adjunct question effects
59 Citations1978Bruce K. Britton, Alan Piha +2 more
Cognitive capacity usage increased when text-relevant questions began but not when irrelevant questions began or when no questions were given, and the increase was largest on pages immediately following questions.
Contemporary Educational PsychologyVariable inspection time as an indicator of cognitive reading behaviors
6 Citations1981Mark Grabe
