Defining general surgery and the core curriculum
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Creating an objectives/competency-based curriculum is important in addressing concerns about graduate surgical education and may improve the efficiency of training and help resolve the dilemmas of generalist versus specialist training.
Abstract
A Steering Committee of residents and faculty initiated a systematic approach to curriculum development, focusing on competency-based education and emphasizing both resident and faculty engagement in the didactic process.Integrated General Surgery Residency Program at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.Postgraduate year (PGY) 1 through 5 general surgery categorical and preliminary residents.A Core Curriculum consisting of 45-minute blocks and 2.5 hours of resident time per week was developed by a steering committee composed of faculty and residents. Each block is assigned a faculty and resident moderator, and has defined competency and knowledge-based objectives. An anonymous online evaluation tool collected residents' perceptions of value and satisfaction with the curriculum utilizing 15 5-point Likert items focusing on conferences, objectives, preparation, and quality of presentations, and materials. Measures were taken at the close of the previous academic year (baseline) and at 6 months and 1 year after implementation. The analysis focused on the percent responding in the 2 highest Likert categories (good/excellent, almost always/always, agree/strongly agree). The resulting dichotomous outcomes were compared with time point using χ2-tests of proportion; Kruskal-Wallis statistic was also used to compare the full distribution of responses. All analyses were done using SPSS v. 14 with α = 0.05.One hundred two surveys were completed on-line (42 at baseline, 38 at 6 months, and 22 at 1 year). All 15 items showed increases from baseline to 1-year follow-up; 9 of the 15 were statistically significant with conferences and presentation quality and interaction showing the greatest improvement.Resident satisfaction with the core curriculum, and their self-reported clinical and academic abilities showed improvement after a systematic collaborative faculty–resident approach to curriculum development and implementation.
